INDUSTRY COMPLIANCE

Can I reuse last year's B-BBEE affidavit if the ownership has changed?

Reviewed 7 min read

Quick answer

Do not reuse last year’s affidavit automatically after ownership changes. Check its validity period, the facts declared, the effective ownership change and the applicable code before presenting it as current evidence. A date that has not expired does not establish that the document still supports the claim you are making. Reassess the appropriate evidence route and obtain a properly completed replacement or verification where required. Keep the old affidavit as a historical record and manage updates to buyers through the correct process.

Identify the ownership event precisely

Start with the transaction that changed ownership: a share transfer, new share issue, buyback, member change or another arrangement. Record the legal entity, parties, effective date and approvals. A change in directors is not necessarily a change in ownership, and a signed intention to transfer shares may not establish that the transfer has taken effect. The actual completed facts matter.

Gather the updated securities or member records and relevant agreements before deciding what the B-BBEE position is. Do not infer ownership solely from a CIPC director list or a company profile. If the transaction involves conditions, layered entities, trusts or financing, obtain appropriate advice about the rights and interests that must be assessed.

Read what the old affidavit actually says

Check the entity named, annual revenue period, ownership declarations, status selected and commissioning date. An affidavit can be a truthful historical statement and still be unsuitable for a new current representation after circumstances change. The question is not simply whether the PDF exists or whether a previous customer accepted it.

The Commission’s practice guidance describes validity and required particulars, but validity dates are only part of the review. Compare the declared facts with the current position and applicable requirements. Do not assume that an unexpired document gives permission to repeat an ownership claim that is no longer supported. Ask a qualified adviser to assess the consequence of the actual change.

Separate the dates involved

DateWhat it tells you
Financial year used for revenueThe period supporting the revenue declaration
Affidavit commissioning dateWhen the statement was sworn and validity is assessed
Ownership effective dateWhen the underlying rights changed
Customer or tender submission dateWhen the business made the representation
Required validity or assessment stageWhat the actual buyer instructions require

These dates should not be collapsed into a single last updated field. A later ownership change does not rewrite the prior financial year, and a new financial year does not by itself explain the legal effective date of a share transfer.

Illustrative example: a new investor joins

A fictional company commissioned an affidavit while one owner held all its shares. Later, it issues shares to a new investor. The company’s sales team continues attaching the old affidavit to proposals because it is the file saved in the tender folder. The team has checked the document’s date but has not reviewed the ownership facts.

The company first confirms that the share issue has been completed and updates the corporate records. It then obtains an assessment of the current ownership position and the evidence route permitted under the applicable code. The example does not assume the new investor’s characteristics or assign a new B-BBEE level; those facts and rules must be assessed.

The old document is retained in the historical file, and the active supplier pack is updated with appropriate current evidence. The company also identifies submissions made after the change and reviews any notification or correction requirements in the relevant procurement or customer process. It does not silently replace an attachment in an already submitted bid without authority.

Reassess eligibility as well as the percentage

An ownership change can affect more than one number on the form. It may alter the appropriate status or whether the entity remains eligible for an affidavit route under the applicable rules. Review the entity category, relevant revenue and sector code as well as ownership. Do not simply edit the old percentage and assume every other declaration remains valid.

The Commission’s guidance distinguishes qualifying affidavit routes from verification requirements. Where a new structure is complex or does not meet the relevant conditions, specialist assessment may be needed. Avoid treating a generic online template as a calculator that resolves legal rights, economic interests or the effect of financing arrangements.

Prepare a replacement through the proper process

Use the appropriate current form or verification process once the facts and route are established. The authorised person should understand and support the declarations. Complete the relevant fields and follow proper commissioning requirements. A replacement is a new statement based on its own evidence, not an edited scan of the earlier signed document.

Do not alter signatures, commissioning dates, stamps or historical ownership figures on the original. Preserve the old version and clearly identify the new one. If a correction is needed because the earlier affidavit was inaccurate when made, obtain advice on the appropriate corrective action rather than describing every problem as a routine renewal.

Update the underlying company records consistently

Ensure the share register, share certificates where relevant, agreements and required company filings reflect the transaction accurately. B-BBEE evidence should not become the only place where a change appears. Directors and administrators need a consistent record of who holds the rights and when they changed.

Also review supplier profiles and company materials that repeat ownership claims. A new affidavit does not automatically update the CSD, a customer’s vendor portal or a website. Assign responsibility for each relevant update and retain completion evidence. Keep the content factual while any official update or verification is still in progress.

Handle existing tenders and customer submissions carefully

List material submissions made using the old evidence and identify their dates and requirements. If a bid is still open or an award process is underway, follow the authorised clarification or notification route and obtain advice where necessary. Do not assume the business can replace a document after closing or that every change automatically disqualifies a bid. The actual rules and facts govern the response.

For ongoing customer relationships, review contractual representations and update procedures. Explain the change accurately where notification is required. A customer’s earlier acceptance does not relieve the business of making truthful later statements. Retain the communication and the evidence supplied so the record shows what the customer was told and when.

Distinguish ownership from management changes

A new director, manager or employee does not automatically own shares. Conversely, a shareholder can change without a corresponding change to the board. Check the legal records before deciding that an affidavit needs an ownership percentage update. This avoids both overlooking real changes and making unnecessary or incorrect amendments based on job titles.

Where voting rights, economic interests or control differ from a simple share count, disclose the relevant arrangements to the adviser. Do not remove inconvenient agreements from the evidence pack. The assessment should reflect substance and the applicable code, not merely the most favourable document in the folder.

Control which version is treated as current

Maintain a short document register with the entity, evidence type, relevant period, commissioning or issue date, review date and current status. Mark superseded copies for historical retention and remove them from active proposal templates. Staff should be able to find the current approved document without choosing among several similarly named files.

Review the register whenever ownership, sector activity or revenue category changes. The article on choosing an affidavit or certificate route explains the broader decision. A calendar reminder is useful, but event-driven review is equally important.

Record uncertainty while a transaction is being completed

A proposed ownership transaction can involve an agreement date, conditions, payment and a later effective transfer. Give the adviser the complete sequence and identify what has actually occurred. Do not state that a new investor owns shares merely because negotiations are advanced, or continue using an old ownership claim after the relevant rights have changed. The effective position requires assessment of the documents and facts.

If a buyer asks for evidence during that transition, explain the current verified position through the permitted process and seek advice on the appropriate document. A pending transaction should not be hidden, but it should also not be represented as completed before it is. Keep the review and any customer communication with the transaction record.

Bring the transaction and old evidence together

Vatco’s B-BBEE evidence support can help organise the review and appropriate next step. Bring the old affidavit, completed ownership transaction records, current shareholding information and relevant buyer instructions. For the corporate record side, shareholding change support is a related service.

Do not ask only for the date on last year’s form to be changed. The useful outcome is evidence that accurately reflects the applicable facts and requirements, with a clear record of what changed and which earlier documents remain historical.

Sources and review

Checked on 30 September 2026. Use the linked official guidance for current requirements and forms.

  1. the dtic B-BBEE codes and affidavit forms

    Official generic and sector code resources and affidavit forms. Apply the gazetted rules relevant to the entity, not a draft proposal.

  2. B-BBEE Commission frequently asked questions

    Official distinction between affidavit routes and accredited verification, including ownership and entity categories. Sector-specific rules require separate checking.

  3. B-BBEE Commission Practice Guide 01 of 2022

    Official validity guidance reviewed through indexed official text because direct retrieval failed. Check current applicable code and document requirements before use.

  4. Companies Act

    Official legal context for company ownership and securities records; the article does not determine a particular transaction’s validity.

YOUR NEXT STEP

Support for B-BBEE certificate

Discuss your records and the support your business needs.

Explore B-BBEE certificate
LET’S MOVE YOUR BUSINESS FORWARD

Submit your enquiry, then create an account to follow your request.

  1. 01 Service
  2. 02 Details
  3. 03 Contact
  4. 04 Review

STEP 1 OF 4

What can we help with?

Privacy notice (opens in a new tab)