Clarify what the partners’ legal roles actually are
People often use business partner to describe a co-founder, shareholder, director or member of a partnership. Those roles are not interchangeable. Identify the legal structure and each person's actual appointments before dividing compliance work. A shareholder may not be the person authorised to make a particular filing or management decision.
For a company, the Companies Act provides the board and director-duty framework. A task spreadsheet does not replace the Act, the Memorandum of Incorporation or properly recorded company decisions. Practical delegation should fit those arrangements.
Record any external appointments, such as an accountant or tax practitioner, separately. The adviser may prepare specified work while an authorised company person reviews information or approves action. Paying a service provider does not establish that every obligation has been included in their engagement.
Build the list from the business’s actual activities
Identify the entity's registrations, employees, premises, contracts and regulated activities. Use those facts to determine which recurring filings, payments, renewals and record requirements need attention. Avoid copying a generic calendar and assuming that every item applies or that nothing else does.
Record the source of each obligation and deadline. A date may come from legislation, an assessment, a registration anniversary, a contract or a specific authority notice. Keeping that source makes it possible to check the date when circumstances change.
Separate preparation, submission, payment and verification. They may have different owners and completion evidence. A prepared return is not a submitted return, and a bank payment confirmation does not necessarily show correct allocation to the intended account. The task list should reflect those stages where they matter.
Use a small responsibility matrix
| Task field | What the partners should agree |
|---|---|
| Preparation owner | Who gathers information and prepares the work |
| Review or approval | Who checks accuracy and has authority to approve |
| Submission or payment | Who performs the authorised action |
| Completion evidence | Which receipt, status or record closes the task |
| Backup and escalation | Who acts if the owner is unavailable or a problem arises |
Use names or defined roles rather than both partners for every field. Shared awareness is valuable, but a task with no clear next actor can remain unfinished while each person assumes the other is handling it.
Where one person performs several stages, make that explicit and choose a proportionate review. A small business may not have enough staff for complete separation of duties, but it can still document approval and retain understandable evidence.
Check authority before assigning an action
Confirm that the proposed person is authorised for the particular system or decision. Access to a mailbox does not establish authority to act for the entity. A banking role may differ from a tax-portal role, and a company resolution may be needed for a particular appointment or transaction.
Use appropriate individual user access and formal mandates where required. Do not make sharing a personal password the foundation of the arrangement. Keep authentication details with the authorised user and maintain a separate record of the business roles and permissions.
The SARS representative guidance illustrates why a statutory or system role needs its own evidence. Assigning one partner to monitor tax work does not automatically update the representative record or transfer all permissions held by a departing practitioner.
Plan the work before the final deadline
Work backwards from the actual due date. Allow time for missing records, review, approval and any necessary correction. Internal target dates are planning choices, so label them separately from legal or authority deadlines. Do not present an internal reminder as the official filing date.
Include dependencies. A payroll reconciliation may require corrected employee data, and an annual filing may depend on ownership information being current. Assign the upstream task as well as the final submission so that the person responsible is not waiting for unowned work.
Agree how the partners will see approaching and overdue tasks. A short regular review can focus on exceptions: missing evidence, disputed figures, failed submissions and decisions needed. Avoid treating a calendar notification as proof that the task has been completed.
Define what counts as completion
For each task, identify the record that demonstrates the required outcome. It might be a submission receipt, a current status check, an assessment or a payment allocation. Keep the evidence with the relevant period, entity and task reference.
Use precise status labels such as awaiting records, ready for approval, submitted or queried. A single done column can conceal whether the authority accepted the filing or whether a follow-up remains outstanding. Preserve the distinction between the business's action and the authority's response.
If a submission fails, record the error and the next responsible person. If the issue is escalated to an adviser or authority, keep the reference and follow-up date. The task remains visible until the relevant result is verified or the unresolved position is clearly documented.
Apply the arrangement to a two-owner company
Suppose one director handles operations and the other handles finance. The operations director supplies employee changes and supporting records. The finance director coordinates payroll preparation, while the agreed reviewer checks the resulting totals and the authorised user submits the required information.
The matrix should show when the operations information is due, who resolves discrepancies and which evidence confirms submission and payment. If the finance director is away, the backup needs appropriate authority and access before the deadline, not merely a promise to obtain it later.
The example does not establish the duties of every two-owner business. Its purpose is to show how a broad statement such as finance handles compliance can be converted into specific inputs, decisions and completion checks. The legal structure and actual appointments still govern authority.
Agree an escalation route for missing information or disagreement
Decide what happens when a partner cannot provide records, disagrees with a figure or refuses to approve an action. Escalate early enough to obtain advice and make a lawful decision. Do not allow disagreement to turn into an unrecorded assumption that a deadline no longer applies.
Keep the issue factual: the disputed item, evidence available, decision required and date by which action is needed. Use the company's governance arrangements and appropriate professional advice for material disputes. A task owner should not invent authority to resolve a matter reserved for someone else.
Document the outcome and any revised responsibility. If the underlying relationship has changed, review mandates and access rather than leaving the previous arrangement in place. Clear records help both partners understand what was decided and why. Record any temporary arrangement with an end or review date, so an emergency workaround does not silently become the permanent division of responsibility.
Review the arrangement when the business changes
Revisit responsibilities when a new employee, adviser, activity or registration is added, or when an owner leaves. Check open tasks, notice addresses, stored records and system permissions. The handover should preserve the company's ability to act without relying on one person's memory or private inbox.
Keep a shared business record location with access appropriate to each role. Confirm that backups can find the relevant documents and understand their status. Do not give every person access to all personal or financial information merely because the folder is shared.
Structuring and compliance advice can help map obligations to the actual business. A workable allocation makes preparation, authority and verification visible while preserving the legal responsibilities that cannot be changed by an informal division of tasks.
At the next review, select one recently completed obligation and trace it from source records to final evidence. This provides a practical check that the agreed process works in use, rather than existing only as a signed matrix.
Sources and review
Checked on 30 September 2026. Use the linked official guidance for current requirements and forms.
- Companies Act 71 of 2008
Sections66 and76 provide board and director-duty context. Task allocation does not amend statutory responsibilities or governance documents.
- SARS: Registered representatives
Current registration channels, representative capacity and evidence requirements, checked 30 September 2026.
- SARS: Register for eFiling and manage your user profile
Organisation and practitioner profiles, activation and access administration.
Support for Advisory on business structuring and compliance
Discuss your records and the support your business needs.
Explore Advisory on business structuring and compliance