Establish the status before choosing the wording
Collect the authority's current record, application reference and correspondence. Identify whether the business is preparing an application, has submitted it, is answering a query or has received an approval. Each stage supports a different statement.
Do not rely only on a payment receipt or an adviser's progress message. Those may establish that a step occurred without proving the final outcome. Where the authority offers a verification service, use the relevant reference and confirm the result for the correct entity.
Record the date checked and the source. This gives the person approving website copy a basis for the claim and a way to revisit it later. If records conflict, resolve the discrepancy before selecting the most favourable wording.
Use wording that matches the evidence
| Evidence available | Accurate treatment | Avoid implying |
|---|---|---|
| Internal intention only | Keep as a business plan or clearly stated future intention where relevant | An application already exists |
| Submission acknowledgement | Application submitted, if that fact is useful and current | Approval or permission granted |
| Authority query | Application remains unresolved | A guaranteed completion date |
| Verified approval | State the actual holder and approved scope | Approval of unrelated services |
Do not make pending status a promotional badge that resembles an approved credential. A small qualification beneath a large certified heading can still leave visitors with the wrong impression.
Keep the statement proportionate. If an application is irrelevant to the current service offer, it may be clearer to omit it until there is a verified outcome rather than publishing a long progress narrative.
Separate website wording from permission to perform the work
Accurate wording does not answer whether the business may legally offer or perform the underlying activity. If a registration or licence is a prerequisite, obtain advice on the actual rules and circumstances before accepting work that depends on it.
A sentence saying application pending is not a substitute for required approval. Nor does it automatically make an otherwise prohibited service offer acceptable. The business should review the service availability and customer commitments alongside the wording.
Identify which activities can proceed and which must wait, based on the relevant authority's requirements. Give the website team a clear approved service scope. They should not have to infer permission from an application receipt or from the fact that a competitor advertises a similar service.
Check who holds the registration and what it covers
Once approval is received, compare the legal name, registration number, activity, class, premises and other relevant conditions with the business's intended claim. A credential held by a director, subcontractor or related company is not automatically a credential of the website operator.
Describe a person's qualification as that person's qualification where appropriate. Describe a supplier relationship accurately rather than presenting the supplier's status as the company's own. If the business relies on a permitted partnership arrangement, explain the relationship without overstating it.
A registration can also have a limited scope. Avoid changing a specific approval into a claim that every service or product is accredited. Keep the wording close to what the evidence establishes and retain the source for later review.
Review the impression created by the whole page
The Consumer Protection Act addresses false or misleading representations, including claims about status or approval, within its scope. A website review should therefore consider what a visitor is likely to understand from the combined text and presentation.
Check headings, icons, logos, testimonials and nearby service descriptions together. A page can imply approval without using the word approved. For example, displaying an authority's emblem beside a service may suggest a relationship that the business does not hold.
Do not assume a disclaimer at the bottom fixes an inaccurate main claim. Correct the claim where it appears. Keep any necessary qualification clear and connected to the statement rather than placing it where a visitor is unlikely to see it.
Find every place where the claim appears
Search the website for the registration name, abbreviations, old status wording and related badge text. Review the homepage, service pages, about page, footer and contact journey. Check downloadable profiles, quotations and brochures linked from the site.
Include page titles, descriptions and structured business information where the website controls them. A corrected visible paragraph can coexist with an outdated search description or document title. Update the underlying content source so the old claim is not regenerated later.
Inspect images containing text as well as ordinary copy. A badge embedded in a banner will not necessarily appear in a text search. Keep a list of affected surfaces and record which version was checked after the correction.
Correct a pending claim in a practical way
Imagine a company has submitted an industry-registration application and its draft homepage says fully registered specialists. The authority has requested more information and has not issued a decision. The headline is unsupported and should be removed or rewritten to match the actual service position.
The business should also check whether it may currently offer the advertised activity. If the activity depends on approval, the response may require changing availability as well as wording. A pending label alone does not establish that the service may proceed.
When an approval later arrives, the team should verify its holder and scope before adding a claim. The new wording should not simply restore the old broad headline. It should describe the status actually granted and avoid extending it to unrelated work.
Keep a simple register of important website claims
Record the claim, source evidence, authority or issuer, holder, scope, review date and owner. Include any expiry or condition that may require a future update. Keep confidential supporting material in an appropriate internal location rather than making every document public.
Assign a person to tell the website team when an application is approved, refused, withdrawn, suspended or otherwise changes. A designer may have no direct access to the authority's correspondence. The business needs a clear route from the official event to the published correction.
Review reused material too. Sales staff may continue sending an old profile after the site is corrected. Replace outdated templates and explain the approved wording so that the same unsupported claim does not return through another channel.
Plan for changes after approval
Approval is not the end of the publishing workflow. A credential may later expire, change scope or require an update after a change in the business. Identify the events that should trigger a review instead of treating the first approval as permanent evidence.
Keep renewal preparation separate from the published status. Starting a renewal does not by itself establish that the prior approval continues without interruption. Check the issuing authority’s actual position and update the claim if necessary. The owner responsible for the registration should confirm the facts before the website team makes the change.
Verify the correction in the actual customer-facing version
After editing, open the affected pages and documents in the environment customers use. Check that the corrected text and imagery are visible and that old linked files have been replaced appropriately. A change in a draft file does not prove the public page has updated.
Keep the review focused on the actual claim and related service implications. Confirm the relevant headings, metadata and downloads, and record any external listing the business must update separately. Search-engine display changes may take time, so distinguish the website's current content from an older cached result.
Website support can help locate and correct the affected content while preserving the established brand. The business remains responsible for confirming the status and lawful service scope. The finished page should make the evidence understandable without turning an application or limited credential into a broader promise.
If the incorrect claim was used in an active proposal or customer discussion, assess whether a direct correction is needed through the authorised business contact. Updating the website may not resolve a misunderstanding already created in a separate transaction.
Sources and review
Checked on 30 September 2026. Use the linked official guidance for current requirements and forms.
- Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
Sections29 and41 address misleading marketing and representations, subject to the Act’s application. Do not present pending registrations as approved.
- Companies Act 71 of 2008
Sections66 and76 provide board and director-duty context. Task allocation does not amend statutory responsibilities or governance documents.
Support for Website design
Discuss your records and the support your business needs.
Explore Website design