Make sure the register describes a specific item
A line labelled laptop or equipment is difficult to verify when the business owns several similar items. Start with the asset identifier, serial number, description, purchase reference, custodian and recorded location. Check whether the register contains separate items or a grouped balance. A missing description may be a data problem before it is a physical loss.
Confirm the legal owner and accounting category. Leased, hired, borrowed and employee-owned equipment can be physically present without being owned in the same way as purchased assets. The accounting treatment may still require recognition under the applicable framework, but the control record should explain the arrangement. Do not assume that everything in the office belongs to the company or that every owned item is currently on site.
Perform checks in both directions
A register-to-floor check asks whether each listed item can be found. A floor-to-register check asks whether each physical item has an appropriate record. The second check can reveal unrecorded purchases, duplicate descriptions or equipment belonging to another party. Use a dated count sheet and identify who performed and reviewed the check. A verbal statement that everything looks fine is not a reconciliation.
Record the condition and identifying details seen during the check, not just a tick beside the description. If an asset tag is missing, use the serial number or other reliable evidence and arrange a controlled replacement label. Do not attach the identity of an unlocated asset to a similar item simply to make the totals agree.
Investigate ordinary movements first
Ask whether the item moved to another branch, a customer site, a repairer or an employee’s home under an authorised arrangement. Review transfer forms, service bookings, dispatch notes, job records and custody acknowledgements. Contact the responsible person and obtain current confirmation that identifies the actual item. A general reply that the team has some laptops is not enough to resolve a specific serial number.
Check recent replacement and disposal activity. The old asset may have been traded in, scrapped or sold without the register being updated. Alternatively, a replacement may have been entered using the old description, leaving a duplicate line. Retain the purchase and disposal references so the investigation can establish which item each transaction relates to.
Classify the difference before changing accounts
| Finding | Possible next action | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Located at another site | Update location and custody | Verified serial number and transfer record |
| At a repairer | Record temporary location and expected return | Service job and repairer confirmation |
| Duplicate register entry | Review and correct the duplicate | Original invoice and posting trail |
| Previously sold or scrapped | Assess disposal accounting | Approval, proceeds and disposal evidence |
| Still unlocated | Escalate investigation and assess financial effect | Search record, custody history and incident facts |
These are investigation routes, not automatic journals. The appropriate accounting and tax treatment depends on the facts and the framework the entity applies. Keep unresolved items visible until the decision is supported.
Illustrative example: three missing devices have different causes
A fictional business cannot find three laptops during a count. The register gives each a different serial number. The first is confirmed at a repairer using the service receipt and a direct confirmation. The second was sold to an employee under an approved sale, but the register was never updated. The third remains unlocated after custody and site checks.
Deleting all three assets would misstate the position. The first requires a location update and follow-up on return. The second requires review of the sale, proceeds and disposal accounting. The third needs further investigation and an assessment of any loss or other financial effect based on the available facts. The example does not assume theft or prescribe the same treatment for all missing equipment.
The reviewer also checks whether the employee sale payment reached the business and whether the correct device was transferred. A disposal approval without evidence of completion is incomplete. If the item is still in company use, the intended sale may not explain the physical position at the count date.
Preserve evidence if loss or misconduct is suspected
Record when and where the item was last verified, who had authorised custody and which checks have been completed. Preserve relevant access records, handover documents and communications through the business’s normal processes. Limit access to personal information and avoid circulating accusations before facts are established. A missing asset can result from poor records, an unrecorded movement or an actual loss.
Escalate to the responsible manager and obtain appropriate legal, employment or insurance advice where needed. Follow applicable reporting and policy requirements for the actual incident. Do not deduct the item’s value from an employee’s pay merely because their name appears as custodian. Employment deductions and liability require their own lawful basis and process.
Keep insurance and recovery separate from the asset decision
If the business has insurance, review the policy and notify the insurer through the required process using accurate facts. Retain the claim reference and requested evidence. An expected claim payment should not automatically cancel the asset loss in the accounts or cash forecast. Coverage, acceptance, excess and settlement timing may remain uncertain.
Likewise, a possible recovery from a third party is not the same as cash received or an established receivable. Ask the accountant how the asset and any recovery should be assessed under the applicable framework. Keep the amounts and assumptions separate so the owner can understand the gross exposure and the status of the recovery.
Review the accounting record with the evidence
Give the accountant the original cost, accumulated depreciation, carrying amount and the investigation outcome. The IFRS Foundation’s IAS 16 overview explains the recognition, measurement and derecognition framework for property, plant and equipment under full IFRS; the entity’s actual reporting framework must be confirmed. A fully depreciated item can still need control records while it remains in use.
Do not equate the original purchase price with the current accounting loss or replacement cost. Those figures answer different questions. The journal may also affect accumulated depreciation, proceeds or other accounts rather than simply reducing expenses. Obtain a clear calculation and approval, then retain the posting reference with the supporting evidence.
Reconcile the revised register back to the ledger
After approved changes, reconcile opening balances, additions, disposals, depreciation and other adjustments to the closing register and ledger. Investigate unexplained differences rather than inserting a balancing asset. Check that an item removed from the register has received the appropriate ledger treatment and that a corrected duplicate does not leave duplicated depreciation behind.
Keep the original count and register version, the exception list and the approved resolution. Record who made each change and when. This allows a later reviewer to understand why an asset disappeared from the records and prevents the same unresolved difference from resurfacing at every year end. An audit trail is particularly useful when several staff members manage equipment movements.
Record the date the difference relates to
A count performed after year end may reveal an item is missing now without establishing whether it was missing at the reporting date. Trace the movement history and explain what is known about timing. A repair receipt dated after year end, for example, can help establish that the item still existed when it was handed to the repairer. Do not backdate a disposal solely to simplify the reconciliation.
Give the preparer the discovery date, last confirmed sighting and any evidence of an intervening event. Those facts help determine the appropriate period and disclosures. If timing remains uncertain, state the limitation and the investigation performed rather than inserting an invented loss date.
Improve the control that allowed the gap
Use the finding to improve a specific process: movement approvals, repair tracking, employee handovers, disposal records or asset tagging. Avoid creating a complicated system that no one maintains. Assign a custodian, require a usable identifier and make location changes easy to record. Repeat checks according to the value, mobility and risk of the assets rather than treating every item identically.
Vatco’s fixed asset register service can help organise the reconciliation and supporting schedules. Bring the current register, ledger balances, physical count and evidence for each exception. The article on records for used equipment purchases explains how a clearer acquisition file makes later verification easier.
Sources and review
Checked on 30 September 2026. Use the linked official guidance for current requirements and forms.
- SARS record keeping
Official requirements for orderly, accessible supporting business and tax records.
- IFRS Foundation IAS 16 overview
Official overview of property, plant and equipment recognition, measurement, depreciation and derecognition. The entity’s applicable reporting framework must be confirmed.
- Basic Conditions of Employment Act
Official employment-law entry point relevant to the caution against automatic payroll deductions for missing equipment. No specific liability finding is made.
Support for Fixed asset register
Discuss your records and the support your business needs.
Explore Fixed asset register